From a0fe70126424816d263cbde4d04729879fab80e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: EmanuelFeru Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 15:48:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md --- README.md | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 26993a1..7c9803e 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -17,22 +17,22 @@ The main firmware architecture including: - FOC Algorithm: *implements the FOC strategy* - Control Type Manager: *Manages the transition between Commutation and FOC Algorithm* ---> figure FW architecture +![Firmware architecture](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EmanuelFeru/hoverboard-firmware-hack-FOC/master/docs/pictures/FW_architecture.png?token=AF5B7SJJQKTGBC5O3JSJA3S5THYAC) The FOC algorithm architecure is illustrated in the figure below: ---> figure +![FOC algorithm](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EmanuelFeru/hoverboard-firmware-hack-FOC/master/docs/pictures/FOC_algorithm.png?token=AF5B7SMHSBHOIMKNDO6MI6K5THYDQ) In this firmware 2 control methods are available: - Commutation method - FOC method -![Schematic representation of the available control methods](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EmanuelFeru/hoverboard-firmware-hack/master/01_Matlab/02_Figures/control_methods.png) +![Schematic representation of the available control methods](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EmanuelFeru/hoverboard-firmware-hack-FOC/master/01_Matlab/02_Figures/control_methods.png?token=AF5B7SKKAOYGW53BEGBSWBK5THYFU) A short video showing the noise performance of the Commutation method vs advanced control method: [â–ºVideo: Commutation method vs FOC](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vC_kEkp2LE2lAaMCJcmK4z2m3jrPUoBD/view) -![Hoverboard wheel](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EmanuelFeru/hoverboard-firmware-hack/master/docs/pictures/hoverboard_wheel.JPG) +![Hoverboard wheel](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EmanuelFeru/hoverboard-firmware-hack-FOC/master/docs/pictures/hoverboard_wheel.JPG?token=AF5B7SLDXZCN4P2IJ6WWBYC5THYIO) ---